To Think About . . .

It’s not whether you win or lose, it’s how you place the blame. Oscar Wilde

 

 

 

My Latest Book

Product Details

Also available on Amazon.com, Amazon.fr, and other Amazons and bookshops worldwide! 

Search This Site
Log-in
Latest Comments
My Other Books

Product Details

Product Details

Product Details

The Pathway to Awesomeness

Click to order other recommended books.

Find Us on Facebook Badge

Discussion Forum > Productivity... it's all about your mother

"My mother taught me a value — rigid discipline. My father didn't earn enough, and my mother took care of the money and the family, and she had no time for lightness. She always saw the glass a third full. She taught me to work and not to waste time." - Woody Allen

http://www.esquire.com/features/what-ive-learned/woody-allen-0913

As a therapist, this does not surprise me at all. Which is why I'm calling shenanigans on any productivity author resting on research (all the rage these days), rather than background to support their 1-stop productivity solutions.
August 10, 2013 at 20:53 | Registered Commenteravrum
Not sure what you are saying here, Avrum.

Are you saying that we can't improve on what our mother taught us and that therefore the only way to be productive is to have had the right mother? Or am I totally misunderstanding you?
August 11, 2013 at 18:11 | Registered CommenterMark Forster
Hi Mark.

"Are you saying that we can't improve on what our mother taught us"

We can, albeit in degrees that are closely aligned from where we came from. However, many productivity authors conveniently ignore the profound impact upbringing had on their snares and solutions vis-a-vis productivity.

Woody Allen's honesty is refreshing. He's basically saying that his anxiety and fear, probably bred by post-holocaust activity - pushes him to do things that most (even filmmakers) won't do.

I'd love to read a biography on S. Covey, Tim Ferris, D. Allen, etc., whereby an author would explore the role of parenting, socio-economic status, etc and the impact this had on their drive for success.
August 11, 2013 at 19:10 | Registered Commenteravrum
avrum:

I once coached a professor of psychology in his 60s who was extremely disorganised. All he wanted to do was talk about his childhood, and he made no attempt to do any of the homework I agreed with him. Result: he made no progress at all.

On the other hand I was once being coached by a rather fiery Spanish lady, and I made the mistake of trying the childhood bit on her. Her response was "So you had a difficult childhood - we all did. Get over it!"

I've never tried to blame anything on my childhood since, and I'm eternally grateful to her.
August 11, 2013 at 23:45 | Registered CommenterMark Forster
<<I've never tried to blame anything on my childhood since>>

Mark - this is a red herring. I never said that self-development is doomed because of childhood experiences.

On that note... I'm off to watch the new Woody film.
August 12, 2013 at 0:09 | Registered Commenteravrum
Mark:

One more thing... are you suggesting that Woody Allen's unmatched output of one film a year has less to do with his upbringing (as he suggests), and more to do with a productivity system/tool?

Or that almost every professional athlete (I'm thinking hockey) are bred from professional sport playing parents?
August 12, 2013 at 0:42 | Registered Commenteravrum
Hi Avrum
I think you're messing with the statistics. Research basketball, baseball, soccer, olympians, etc. While you're at it, research all areas of success that require unending determination, practice and mastery. Musicians, scientists, doctors, entrepeneurs, etc.

Your parents, school system, community, church/synagogue, etc can help or hinder your trajectory and ambition. Even the 5% truly talented and/or brilliant people have to have ambition to develop it. No matter what mastery you're attempting to attain, it requires a hell of a lot of determination because it always involves doing much that isn't "pleasant". Even amateurs and hobbyists are sometimes willing to put in the grueling days, years and decades. Bottom line: upbringing and talent alone isn't enough. The world is filled with "almost champions", almost famous musicians, almost famous writers, only pretty good doctors, only very good academicians and scholors, etc. Discipline is just a synonym for determination which is feuled by how much you want it to happen. Many heros, musicians, scholors, professional sports players, doctors, etc started life in a very disadvantaged position yet were ambitious enough to do whatever it took. Conversely, many people have many more advantages and the talent and/or intelligence that could guarantee success but they decide to piss it away. It's a combo of luck and determination to succeed but luck or being fortunate isn't worth a damn without enough determination to put up with the grueling/unpleasant aspects of attaining it.

Your past can greatly affect you and it will. But your determination can override it. It may cause it to be much harder for you but if you REALLY want it badly enough, that won't ever deter you enough to stop you.

Also, you don't even factor in genetic propensities. Just as you are born with propensities that give you advantages, those same genetics may also give you challenges to overcome as well. Ask all those successful people who have only average abilities and no mentors or other advantages. They weren't born with any edge nor did their circumstances give them any edge. They just used their determination to beat the odds.

Your genetic challenges and ghosts of the past may make things harder for you but your determination can override all that......if you want it bad enough.

Productivity systems basically keep you abreadst of what's on your plate and your ambitions. Some may offer tips, procedures and rules. Bottom line, any system that allows you to be aware of what your responsibilities are and what your ambitions are do their job. You have to rule yourself via your determination to discover how to overcome your challenges and shortcomings. No productivity system will do that for you. OTOH, any of them will work if you want them to. Most people use a system that takes advantage of their strengths and mitigates their weaknesses. That's what all of Mark's systems have offerred. If you need to tweak it to work better for you, that's smart. If you're tweaking it to avoid the work you don't like, that won't be helpful. Mark has created many, many systems that will help people to get their work done and meet their aspirations. He suggests to try them out to see which one is a good fit. He also freely expounds on the principles so that you can create your own system. He never mentioned great intelligence, excellent mentors, an advantaged position, supportive people, etc. as preresquisites to successfully work his systems. They are helpful but not required.
August 12, 2013 at 2:38 | Unregistered CommenterLearning as I go
Learning:

<I think you're messing with the statistics.>

Barring a few exceptions, I have two decades of clinical work that supports this observation.
August 12, 2013 at 3:20 | Registered Commenteravrum
Oops, tried to edit my post, but the time elapsed. Here it is:

Learning:

<<research all areas of success that require unending determination, practice and mastery. Musicians, scientists, doctors, entrepeneurs, etc>>

Parenting and family background have a much larger influence on determination, practice, etc., etc than productivity authors would have you believe. So, if you really want to understand what makes Stephen King tick, forget about his morning rituals, or pen of choice, ask him about his upbringing.
August 12, 2013 at 3:39 | Registered Commenteravrum
Hi Avrum
Productivity experts aren't trying to solve your issues. That's on the person to learn what they have to do and/or get help and find the determination despite what life hands you.

I went through a lot of years of hell. Doctors have offered to remove some of the scars but they never even mention anything about the really bad ones that can't be removed. It was hell and I was taught that I was evil. The beatings were the least of it. Musch worse crap happened which caused the PSTD I just kept saying to myself, "Hang on, God might have mercy on me." Well, after a couple of decades the PSTD got the best of me. The docs said that they can't stop the flashbacks and nightmares. The horrors caused huge synapses that will get triggered for the rest of my life. (Talk about being embarrassed!)They taught me how to cope with them and wear a plate because of the bruxism. I did well in my schooling and my career but it wasn't easy. I'm ashamed of the scars, the nightmares that make me scream and the flashbacks that embarrass me in public. I worked around it. What choice did I have? Lots of people work around challenges. It might make things more difficult for you but it also gives you confidence that you are "strong enough". In fact it was a blessing because it made dealing with the auto wreck that much easier. Horrible experiences never leave you but life is generous. Many people spend their lifetime coping yet they also use their determination to carve a good and successful life for themselves. Events in your life stay with you forever but you're also living your own life. I say that if you want something bad enough, your determination will keep getting you over the hump. Being productive may require determination and figuring out ways to build on your strengths and figure out workarounds for your weaknesses. Boredom has always made doing certain work painfully effortful but I'm not going to allow that to stop me. It's a matter of how determined you are even if it's simply to avoid penalties or letting somebody down. Applying effort against resistance is a PITA but that's what you've got to do. Mark specializes in helping people work despite resistance. I owe much to him and the posters here. I've always done my work but now I'm more confident about facing resistance and it goes much easier because of Mark's teachings. He's even made several systems. He can't give you determination. What gives me determination despite HATING boring and tedious work is Mark's little and often. I'm driven by keeping the WHY I bother putting myself through it at the forefront of my mind. Without the WHY, I'd never finish my MITs. Without Mark's little and often and DIT principles, it would be much, much more difficult. Mark can't give you determination. You have to pull it out of your own thoughts, values, desires, etc.

We all just do the best that we can. You can't stop some **it but you also can work around it depending on how much you want to. Discipline is just determination. Determination comes from WHY you want to bother and endure. That's outside of productivity systems.
August 12, 2013 at 6:28 | Unregistered CommenterLearning as I go
p.s.
I don't want you to think I had anything extra to make it. I was just lucky enough to find something in me to carry on. My brother didn't make it. I have to do as well as I can because I'm living for both of us.
August 12, 2013 at 6:44 | Unregistered Commenterlearning as I go
avrum:

<< I never said that self-development is doomed because of childhood experiences. >>

Sorry, that's just exactly what I thought you were saying. What are you saying then?
August 12, 2013 at 9:15 | Registered CommenterMark Forster
avrum:

From memory there are approx 250,000,000 people living in the United States. Out of that number there is one person who has an unmatched output of one film per year. Are you saying that Woody Allen's parents gave him some sort of parenting which was quite unique among the other 249,999,999 children who didn't grow up to produce one film a year?

And as for professional sport players and their parents, it's a bit like saying that almost every knight in the Middle Ages had a father who was a knight. Or that kings and queens tend to have parents who are kings and queens.

I'd also be interested to know how anyone could produce a major film a year without having a pretty well-organized system for doing so - a system which other putative film directors could learn a lot from regardless of their family background. For instance considering the timescale involved in producing a movie from beginning to end (financing, concept approval, casting, shooting, editing, distribution, etc.), he would have to be working on more than one movie at a time. That would require the sort of disciplined timetabling that goes into publishing monthly magazines. This is systematic working - a productivity system in fact.

If Woody Allen wrote a textbook for a course on How to Produce and Direct Movies (which for all I know he may already have done) would anyone buy it if it was all about his mother and nothing about the systems and methods he uses?

Of course, if he was just interested in making money, then he could get out a quick ghosted autobiography describing his angst over his upbringing like every other celeb. In fact, isn't that what his movies are all about?
August 12, 2013 at 9:29 | Registered CommenterMark Forster
avrum, I'm not sure why this has to be an either/or thing. I know what you are saying. My father had a habit (and still does) of saying he would get around to such and such, or start something and then give up half way through. That passive behaviour rubbed off on me and I tended to work the same way. So there's the nurture factor. In retrospect I can identify plenty of lost opportunities in my life through thinking like that.

However the research factor has great value too. For example WHY did he abandon things half way through? I know for me it was the feeling that the end was within reach so I could finish any time, so the drive to finish right now was put to one side for something more instantly gratifying. It's the same process which causes marathon runners to collapse 50 yards before the finish line. Why does someone procrastinate? Some degree of fear? Why do we learn to game the very systems we've outsourced to to try and force our behaviour to change (the person who has been on ten diets becuase "none of them work", the person who starts using their tenth productivity system because this one "feels like the one").

After trying 25 years of productivity systems and methods, I came to accept that the only person who can get me over that line is me. I covered all that in the single text file thread so won't repeat it here.

So nurture moulds the way we act, research increasingly explains why those actions happen and knowledge and experience reshapes our behaviour.
August 12, 2013 at 9:58 | Unregistered CommenterChris
Chris

Let me guess... Your father also has a habit of getting up in the morning and going to bed at night, and you've inherited that as well.
August 12, 2013 at 10:25 | Registered CommenterMark Forster
I think when all you have is a hammer, everything starts to look like a nail, this can apply to psychology, productivity and so on.

That said some people are quite driven, and that can have a lot to do with childhood experiences, that said I'm sure it doesn't have to be parental ones.

Coming back to time management and productivity I wonder if a hybrid of two simple systems or principles is going to be better than a single 'holy grail' type system. :)
August 12, 2013 at 10:38 | Registered Commentersmileypete
Avrum:

I notice that the examples you give are from "narrow" professions - movie directors, professional sports players - in which very few people make it to the top. You are therefore dealing with a rather unrepresentative sample of humanity.

What about the dynamics of becoming a successful accountant, lawyer or small businessperson? Are they the same? There's plenty of room for success in these professions and they are much less reliant on being placed in the system at an early stage of one's life.
August 12, 2013 at 10:50 | Registered CommenterMark Forster
Mark, I sleep because I'm a human, not because I learned the behaviour from my father. But I used to treat opportunities and projects the way I did precisely because I learned the behaviour from my father.

I think we're in agreement so I'm not sure what point you were trying to make there.

Chris
August 12, 2013 at 11:32 | Unregistered CommenterChris
Mark

<<What about the dynamics of becoming a successful accountant, lawyer or small businessperson? >>

Uncanny how often lawyers and doctors produce lawyer and doctor kids. However closer to my point, professionals often pass on their habits and drive to their children. Similarly, high-stress, at-risk families pass on similar coping mechanisms to their children. Folks, this really isn't so controversial.

I've worked for non-profits (working low income families), hospitals & currently private practice (mostly mid-high income earners), and these generational trends stand true.

I apologize for not being able to respond to other replies. My family and I are off for some needed R&R. On that note, I have a little more equanimity about traveling with my family than my father, but not by much. See? It's not always about your mother.
August 12, 2013 at 11:33 | Registered Commenteravrum
Chris:

<< I think we're in agreement so I'm not sure what point you were trying to make there. >>

That "saying he would get around to such and such, or starting something and then giving up half way through" is almost as common a human behaviour as sleeping. So saying you have the same behaviour as him means little more than that you are a human being too.
August 12, 2013 at 13:19 | Registered CommenterMark Forster
If my father had instead had a different attitude I would have grown up taking that on board instead.

Do a search for the video of the two little girls, I think their names are "Link" and "Lamb", who play music at white supremicist rallies. Coincidentally their parents are hard right white nationalists. We're all genetically predisposed to be fearful of things which are different (there's the research part), and nurturing can turn that into irrational hate in the context of modern society, which is what this example is.

In a nutshell - mostly we can all change our behaviour with knowledge and research but the way we are raised clearly sets a very powerful baseline from which we start.
August 12, 2013 at 13:43 | Unregistered CommenterChris
avrum:

<< Folks, this really isn't so controversial. >>

No? I thought the nature v. nurture v. free will debate was just about the most controversial subject in psychology and psychotherapy. But what do I know? I've only got fifty years of experience in training and coaching people from all types of backgrounds.

I think one of the problems you have as a clinical psychotherapist (if that's the correct title) is that you deal with people who are malfunctioning. While my experience has by and large been with people who are doing ok and want to do better.

That's probably why I give much less weight to parental influence. I don't deny it of course. But hundreds of thousands of people could no doubt say the same about their parents as Woody Allen, yet probably only a few dozen would have done comparably as well as he has.

As for children following in their parents' footsteps, isn't that more about socio-economic issues rather than the psychology of their individual parents?

My son is a management accountant, I was an Army officer, my father was a senior civil servant, my grandfather was a brewer as were my great grandfather and great great grandfather before him (they owned the brewery). My great great great grandfather was a colliery agent, and he was descended from a long line of farmers going back at least as far as the 16th Century, when they mixed farming with raiding and cattle rustling across the border with Scotland.

Looking at that progression I can see clearly how social and economic developments in England influenced all the changes in occupation (and locality). I'm sure the psychology of the individual people concerned would be fascinating to know about, but I don't need that to explain the progression.

Have a good holiday, and remember that fathers finding a long journey with kids stressful is another thing that's nearly as common as eating and sleeping. You get it as part of being human.
August 12, 2013 at 14:08 | Registered CommenterMark Forster
Chris:

<< If my father had instead had a different attitude I would have grown up taking that on board instead. >>

Not necessarily. I grew up entirely different from my father. In fact fathers' disappointment with their sons being different from them is so common that it's the stuff of countless novels and movies. http://youtu.be/YPSzPGrazPo

<< Do a search for the video of the two little girls, I think their names are "Link" and "Lamb", who play music at white supremicist rallies. Coincidentally their parents are hard right white nationalists. >>

From Wikipedia:

"Lynx and Lamb were about 14 when they decided that they wanted to cease touring. In 2011, in an interview with The Daily, the twins renounced their previous politics. Lamb was quoted saying 'I’m not a white nationalist anymore. My sister and I are pretty liberal now.'"

Peer pressure trumps parent pressure any day!
August 12, 2013 at 14:32 | Registered CommenterMark Forster
Ace, a great example of what I wrote: "So nurture moulds the way we act, research increasingly explains why those actions happen and knowledge and experience reshapes our behaviour". I'll stand by that.

Avrum seems to be saying it's all about parenting, you seem to be seeing it's nothing to do with parenting. I'll leave you both to it.
August 12, 2013 at 15:15 | Unregistered CommenterChris
Chris:

<< you seem to be seeing it's nothing to do with parenting. >>

Maybe you missed the bit where I wrote:

"That's probably why I give much less weight to parental influence. I don't deny it of course."
August 12, 2013 at 15:52 | Registered CommenterMark Forster
(Apologies for the long post)

Fascinating topic.

For what it’s worth, I do believe that family/background is often a more powerful influence than most disciplines recognise. However – and as has already been mentioned – I also believe that it’s only one ingredient within life’s recipe, and it has very different degrees of influence depending upon the individual (as per the examples given above, not to mention the obvious differences between siblings of the same parents).

From my perspective, the careful exploration of underlying patterns / dynamics / beliefs / behaviours that may have arisen from one’s background experiences has the potential to do two things: (1) Provide invaluable insight into the possible primary source of some of our difficulties / weaknesses; and (2) Give us a new vantage point from which we can launch a fresh assault upon these difficulties / weaknesses.

Therapy can fall short of the mark (and sadly, often does) when the individual doesn’t manage to move beyond the new insights to a place of responsibility and action. Here’s a simple case study to try and make the point:

I may discover that my tendency to be easily distracted and avoid finishing projects may be strongly related to my mother’s chronic fear of being criticised (which I now share). This insight may prove a useful means of understanding how firmly entrenched my avoidance of finishing projects is (as opposed to, for example, realising that it is merely because my manager doesn’t check on me as much as my old manager did).

But it’s what I do with this insight that’s really the issue here; and as I see it, there are three broad responses that are possible:

1. Acknowledge the new insight and do nothing about the associated weakness (apart from, potentially, use family / background as an excuse for any subsequent counterproductive behaviour)

2. Acknowledge the insight, have a good crack at doing something about the associated weakness whilst you’re still fired up about the new insight, but ultimately allow yourself to slip back into old patterns before too long.

3. Acknowledge the new insight, and realise that this means you’re likely to struggle with the associated weakness far more than the ‘average’ person will struggle with the same weakness, and therefore resolve to fight it each day with grit and determination (until the day when it eventually – after many moons – becomes more habit than hardship).

Interestingly (I hope), I’d like to try and introduce another angle to this discussion:

When one frequently tweaks and changes one’s system, are we doing the equivalent of the second response? Do we become temporarily fired up and excited about a possible solution to a weakness of ours, before slipping back into old patterns before too long when the excitement begins to fade (and/or the hoped for change is not as significant or as long-lasting as we would like)?

I have no wish to argue against the rare tweak or change to make a system more adaptable to our needs and circumstances, as I believe there is a good case for such tweaks. But that aside, here is my question:

Does our hope in that break-through tweak or change actively stop us from moving towards the third response – that of acknowledging we are caught in an extremely hard-fought battle for a long time to come, and unless we resolve to fight against our weakness with a grit and determination that might eventually become habit one day, then we will never get the better of our weakness/es? I think this is probably the case, because attached to our hope in that break-through tweak is a hidden reliance upon something which is currently outside of us, rather than a determined reliance upon that which must come from within us.

And unless we choose the latter, we will never find ourselves consistently productive.
August 12, 2013 at 21:08 | Unregistered CommenterNeumatist
Hi Neumatist
Brilliant post! If I may, I'd like to add an addendum to the third scenario. Some challenges are life long. My lifelong bugaboo is dealing with boredom and tedium. The skies opened up when I finally realized that there is no cure. It's part of my brain's propensity. Rather than only focusing on the shortcoming, I'm grateful for other advantages as part of the package. When I realized that I'll ALWAYS find approaching boredom or tedium as a HUGE, effortful step, I don't fight it any more as something that can be fixed. It never gets easier. Gather the kahunas to approach the work is always effortful. That will never change. It's been like that since I was a kid. A little bit of procrastination is OK but not if the work is still sitting there anyway. When I was a kid and had to do gardening and lawn chores, I'd ask my dad when I could stop. The labor didn't bother me but the boredom surely was hard to take. His answer was "You can quit when you're finished or the sun sets." It didn't take me long to learn that playing the hare didn't help. All that meant was that the next day, the unfinished work was still there to ruin another weekend day. LOL! If I know that I hate certain work but it won't go away unless I do it, it's better to suffer now and get done so that tomorrow won't be more of the same.

Later, when I had a career there were some lousy jobs. My boss and I took turns who had to do the boring jobs. He'd reward us with lunch and cocktails and closing up shop early if we were drowning in work for a long time. I've always associated effortful work as inevitable. The only cure is to do it. The sooner you get it off your brain, the better you can focus on the work challenges that you gain satisfaction from. It also makes your evenings more peaceful when you know that you're doing your best. It's silly but I get a perverse feeling of victory after finishing work that I hate. The rest of the day, week, etc has an extra sweetness to it without the dread continuing on in your brain. Until I learned Mark Forster's DIT, I used to turn myself into a knot to finish the work in one hit. Little and often is just as effective and MUCH EASIER to accomplish! I like my DIT in a weekly version. With the overview, I can choose MITs in a way that breaks down the effort into less tortuous steps! Mark is a Godsend. Thank you, Mark! When it's genetic, it will always be effortful. With Mark's principles it makes it easier to face the resistance. If I really hate a job, it might take me many little steps to get it done. For some reason, it's so much easier that way. I with I learned about it sooner than 2007! LOL!

Neumatist, thanks for the great post. Even if something can't be habituated into second nature like mastering music or dancing or studying, your post shows that there's no shame to keep at it if that's what you need to do. I believe that Mark has offered so many ways to fight resistance, that I'm sure that many, many people have been helped by him. He can erase genetics or create determination but he has definitely made it far easier for me to get the same work done. I'll say that it's MUCH EASIER to get lousy work done with little and often yet it magically gets done almost as soon as when I used to practically bust a gut making myself keep at it until it's finished. They aught to teach Mark's stuff in schools.
August 13, 2013 at 0:09 | Unregistered CommenterLearning as I go
p.s.
I've never been consistently productive except at work. At home, I've always been free to do things my way. Intelligent procrastination can help. Negligent procrastination can make it worse. We all probably do a bit of both without any real damages. Like Mark says, being productive "on average" works well unless you're on the company clock! LOL!
August 13, 2013 at 0:13 | Unregistered Commenterlearning as I go
Neumatist:

What you are saying brings us back to the role of structure in our lives. It's a well-known phenomenon that the same person will behave very differently in different circumstances. In fact this is one of the main problems that someone faces who leaves full-time employment in order to start up their own business. Suddenly they go from a relatively well-structured environment to one in which there is no structure other than what they provide for themselves. The success of their business often depends on how successfully they put these structures in place.

I've written extensively on the subject on this website and elsewhere. If you do a search for "structure" in the website search box you should come up with a lot of material. Here's one article for starters:

http://markforster.squarespace.com/blog/2007/2/15/the-role-of-structure.html

All I'll say at the moment is that the point of tweaking your time management system is the same as the point of tweaking your invoicing system, your filing system or your contact management system.
August 13, 2013 at 13:30 | Registered CommenterMark Forster
<<Are you saying that Woody Allen's parents gave him some sort of parenting which was quite unique>>

Yes. The combination of oppression --> Holocaust & traditional Jewish values led to incredible feats in buisness, science & entertainment. There's a ton of research done in this area. OTH, some families buckled during these times. Family background has a profound influence on how individuals respond to adversity.

<<This is systematic working - a productivity system in fact.>>

From what I've read, he delegates everything he doesn't enjoy doing. For more on this: see Four Hour Work Week

I'd also like to clear up an oft repeated, but common misconception about therapy. Psychotherapy, particularly Family Systems therapy - what I practice - requires individuals who are (somewhat) mature, forward thinking & willing to do hard work between sessions. Lay people often assume that therapists work with ill people ie Schizophrenia, etc (Mark made this erroneous assumption above - the fact is, appx 65% of my practice are singles & young couples looking to be proactive about their future marriages). Beyond in-patient psychiatry, most clinicians in private practice are working with very able people.

Finally, a couple of people have characterized me as a "it's all about the parents" type of clinician. If you re-read my comments, I think it is apparent that I was trying to suggest that parenting & family of origin issues has a much larger impact than what you typically read about from productivity authors & coaches (In this area, I find Mark's comments to be shockingly inaccurate & out of bounds with the latest research on families, attachment, etc).

Family Systems theory - along with most schools of psychotherapy - consider biological, social, cultural, spiritual & economic forces as part of the kaleidoscope of human functioning. I apologize if I (unwittingly) contributed to the straw-man.
August 14, 2013 at 22:16 | Registered Commenteravrum
avrum:

Didn't Jews achieve lots before the Holocaust? For example I thought Hollywood was almost completely run by them pre-war, that they were exceptionally good at finance, distinguished physicans, artists,and so on. They were developing the techniques of psychoanalysis even before the 19th Century was out.

Woody Allen is third generation American, and his parents were born in the United States in 1900 and 1906 so he would not personally have been directly effected by the Holocaust or the Nazi persecutions preceding it.

I seem to remember studies of identical twins which showed that identical twins reared apart are no more different than identical twins reared together.
August 14, 2013 at 23:35 | Registered CommenterMark Forster
<<Didn't Jews achieve lots before the Holocaust>>

Yes - but Woody's quote (along with the subject matter of his early stand-up material) suggests a post-Holocaust anxiety. With respect to family influence on drive/habits/success, I think the last 10 min of Wild Man Blues (scene w/ Woody's parents) is quite telling.
August 15, 2013 at 0:16 | Registered Commenteravrum
avrum:

<< I think the last 10 min of Wild Man Blues (scene w/ Woody's parents) is quite telling. >>

I'm afraid you'll have to tell me what happens in that. I'm going to have to admit something really terrible here - I'm not actually a great fan of Woody Allen's movies.

I also have to apologize for thinking that you deal mainly with dysfunction. Perhaps I was misled by the AAMFT's list of the topics dealt with by Family Therapists at http://www.aamft.org/imis15/content/Consumer_Updates/Consumer_Updates.aspx

Since Woody Allen's parents were not in the film business, but lots of Jews were and are, is it just possible that Woody Allen's main influence on his career was fellow Jews (and non-Jews) in the film business, and his family background was only of use to him as a mine for material?

And delegating stuff you don't like is part of a good productivity system.
August 15, 2013 at 0:26 | Registered CommenterMark Forster
<<I seem to remember studies of identical twins which showed that identical twins reared apart are no more different than identical twins reared together.>>

According to my wife, this is incorrect, and that the most recent research supports the influence of family and environment. However this is not my area of expertise, so I'm going to bow out here.

Re: Woody's parents (& generation): they would have of age to know about - if not experience pogroms & anti-Semitism culminating in the Holocaust. Either way, the drive to succeed - as self-preservation - stands.
August 15, 2013 at 0:42 | Registered Commenteravrum
<<Woody Allen's main influence on his career was fellow Jews >>

Mark - Woody mentions his mothers influence. Given the amount of therapy he's done, I'm going to assume his observation is the most reliable.
August 15, 2013 at 0:45 | Registered Commenteravrum
avrum:

<< According to my wife, this is incorrect, and that the most recent research supports the influence of family and environment. However this is not my area of expertise, so I'm going to bow out here. >>

Is this "incorrect" as in "Mark's got it wrong and there never were any such studies", or "There were studies like this but their conclusions were exactly the opposite of what he says", or "The studies have been repeated and were unable to be verified"?

<< Re: Woody's parents (& generation): they would have of age to know about - if not experience pogroms & anti-Semitism culminating in the Holocaust. Either way, the drive to succeed - as self-preservation - stands. >>

This is thoroughly fallacious "post hoc ergo propter hoc" reasoning. Woody Allen is a Jew therefore his success must be due to anxiety about the Holocaust. Louis B. Meyer was a Jew too. He was the first American to earn a $1,000,000 dollar salary... in 1937.
August 15, 2013 at 0:51 | Registered CommenterMark Forster
avrum:

<< Woody mentions his mothers influence. Given the amount of therapy he's done, I'm going to assume his observation is the most reliable. >>

But what does it prove? Maybe he works hard because his mother told him to work hard. Maybe he works hard because he has inherited a work-hard gene from her, and he would still have worked hard even if he'd been adopted at birth. And what about all the other things his mother told him to do which he doesn't do?

As a therapist you are I am sure aware that in long-term therapy hazy recollections can solidify into rock-hard certainty simply through repeated retelling.
August 15, 2013 at 1:06 | Registered CommenterMark Forster
Mark - I'm going to do something very productive and leave this back and forth.
August 15, 2013 at 1:15 | Registered Commenteravrum
Would that qualify as a 1-stop productivity solution?
August 15, 2013 at 1:23 | Registered CommenterMark Forster
Thanks so much for the entertaining discussion. I'm a psychologist with six children. While I know for a fact my husband and I relate somewhat differently to each child, we provide a very similar environment for them. The way they approach their school and home responsibilities is pretty different. My oldest is a maniac about school. I once punished him by taking his school books away. My fourth son would forget to take care of even basic hygiene without reminders, let alone school and chores.

I account for the majority of these differences with personality which is primarily genetic. My second son is slow and meticulous, which is nothing like his father or me, but is very much like his uncle.

More and more I am realizing that we ought to choose approaches that work with our personality (or natural bent, if you prefer) than against it. Maximizing results from what we already do makes sense to me. Yet those who market their productivity approaches never ask what their students are already doing or about their personality. Then there's the even deeper question of whether there's anything really wrong with the student's approach or whether s/he has just been convinced by our productivity-driven culture that there is.
August 15, 2013 at 4:21 | Unregistered CommenterMelanie Wilson
Melanie:

<< More and more I am realizing that we ought to choose approaches that work with our personality (or natural bent, if you prefer) than against it. >>

My experience of children (only three in my case) is exactly the same as yours. My children differ greatly in personality in spite of being brought up in the same environment. My son is most like my father, my elder daughter like my wife's mother and my younger daughter a sort of mixture of all of us. (I'd better be careful what I say - they might read this!)

I've always written my time management etc systems for myself, on the basis that if they work for me then they should also work for a fairly large segment of the population. As for those who aren't like me, well there are plenty of other systems/methods around and I'm quite happy for people to find what suits them best.

I would certainly agree that it makes sense to concentrate on maximizing our strengths rather than correcting our weaknesses. That's actually why I've always been quite happy to work with the people who find my stuff useful and not worry about those who don't.
August 15, 2013 at 9:56 | Registered CommenterMark Forster
Recent studies have shown many personality factors (including intelligence) are more related to nurture when a child is young, but genetics by the time you're an adult, assuming, of course, environments within the realm of "typical". (I.e., proper nutrition, no abuse.) The theory is that eventually influences from school and friends outweigh those from home.

I used to feel guilty when my kids took IQ tests because they're heavily vocabulary based. My family reads a lot, and the kids often ask what words mean. (We get funny looks at restaurants and museums.) We even go home after IQ tests an look up the words we don't know! Then I realized that if it's their choice -- wanting to learn is part of their personality.

When the pediatrician wanted to give my son ADHD meds, I found an adult "100 questions to see if you have ADHD" test (in Hallowell's 1st book). Looked back and did it at three points in my life. While in high school, with Mom (who naturally creates a text-book environment for supporting ADHDers) I scored 40. At my worst, with two pre-school kids and stuck in an unhealthy online clique I scored 60. These days it's more like 50. So, yes, environment makes a huge difference. If I hadn't had huge successes as a teen (thanks in part to the environment), I wouldn't know I was capable of them. So nurture has a role.

(I'm not against meds, after a proper work-up, but the pediatrician was a bit too eager. I wish, though, that there were more balanced books. Most said the other side was stupid and evil. Son's now acing high school, except for French and PhysEd.)

Most of my family, including aunts, uncles and cousins, are high achievers -- both brains and discipline, at work and at home (although Dad's idea of paperwork ... let's just say Mom doesn't even let him open the mail).

Myself, though? I'm interested in a good number of things, but have no drive to actually finish any of them -- hence my reliance on external standards. This despite the fact that I earned my Canada Cord in Guides, two scholarships to Waterloo Engineering, and graduated with First Class Honours. Note, though, that all those were external goals with time limits. They were building towards my adult life, not in the middle of it.

Even my datebook has changed over the years. I needed lots of space as a student (and it was just one more big book in my bag). As a stay-home Mom I like a tiny one in my purse.

So, it's not just nurture and nature, it's also environment and life-stage.
August 15, 2013 at 16:17 | Registered CommenterCricket
I posted a lengthy reply last night that has disappeared. Weird! Now I will just have to say that I agree with you both. :-) I think I said something about the environment determining where in the range of our genetic possibilities we fall. I find it comforting that I have some control over my life. That it's not just genetics and upbringing.
August 17, 2013 at 2:06 | Unregistered CommenterMelanie Wilson