To Think About . . .

It’s not whether you win or lose, it’s how you place the blame. Oscar Wilde

 

 

 

My Latest Book

Product Details

Also available on Amazon.com, Amazon.fr, and other Amazons and bookshops worldwide! 

Search This Site
Log-in
Latest Comments
My Other Books

Product Details

Product Details

Product Details

The Pathway to Awesomeness

Click to order other recommended books.

Find Us on Facebook Badge

Discussion Forum > Task dismissal introspection

I've had an idea for a while that might be of interest. It's just a simple rule about task dismissal: dismissed tasks need to change in order to get back on a list.

In GTD terms, if a task isn't being done, the Next Action is probably wrong:

- I shouldn't do it (no resubmission necessary)
- It's no longer the right approach (task becomes the better approach)
- Task can't be done at this time (task becomes 'add to calendar')
- Task depends on prior action (task becomes the real next action)
- I don't want to do it (task becomes 'just get folder out' or is dismissed)

You get the idea. I like the mild enforced introspection.

Sorry if this has already been mentioned.
July 28, 2016 at 8:44 | Unregistered CommenterJohn
Next Action was a big step forward for me. Fortunately (for me), it's now a habit.

My colleagues find it annoying, mostly because it forces the introspection you describe. It's easy to agree to a project in principle, and even commit the group. Finding a volunteer to take the next action is the real test, and I insist we do that for a few next actions before letting the group commit to the project as a whole.
August 5, 2016 at 22:30 | Registered CommenterCricket