To Think About . . .

It’s not whether you win or lose, it’s how you place the blame. Oscar Wilde

 

 

 

My Latest Book

Product Details

Also available on Amazon.com, Amazon.fr, and other Amazons and bookshops worldwide! 

Search This Site
Log-in
Latest Comments
My Other Books

Product Details

Product Details

Product Details

The Pathway to Awesomeness

Click to order other recommended books.

Find Us on Facebook Badge

Discussion Forum > Callibration at start-up

Mark

Having read of the other posts and from my own personal observations after 2 days I am experiencing some issues with the system that I do believe will sort themselves out over time.

I work as a Corporate IT Manager and much of my work day is pre-scheduled with meetings and 121s with the directs. As such my "processing windows" are limited. I currently have 4 pages of actions and today I only got to the second page. (However, I did a number of actions and would call it a successful day)

I think this is telling me 2 things:- I need more personal processing time (and yes this has gone onto my list) but also that it will take a period of time for the system to callibrate itself. I have read your post on speed of movement and I would not be at all suprised if the auto-focussing does not take me through the lists a whole lot quicker on the next couple of days so that I experience the value of multiple passes despite still having limited time inbetween meetings.

I actually believe this may just be an intuitive part of the process.

The same would probably happen if I suddenly had a couple of free days - I think the system would auto-callibrate and that my page reviews would result in more items standing out simply because I intuitively know I have more processing time.

Anyway, that is my hypothesis. I will post again in a few days to confirm whether it worked out this way or not.

One question - Do you actually mark in someway where you got up to (for example if you broke off half way down a page to attend a meeting) so that you know where to re-commence? I think one of my issues is that when I return to my lists I keep starting from the top of page 1 again - obviously this is wrong and is certainly part of the reason I did not get beyond page 2!
January 7, 2009 at 21:04 | Unregistered CommenterAndy from Preston
Hi Andy

I used to get a bit lost in my pages but I numbered them and when I come back to them after time away I just review the whole page again that I was last working on. This way, although maybe not strictly as Mark suggested, it works for me.
January 7, 2009 at 23:46 | Unregistered CommenterHannah
Andy:

What I do is put a dot beside an item when I start working on it. This is the start point for the line I draw when I cross the item out when I finish working on it. If I leave the list while working on an item I can always see which one I was working on.
January 7, 2009 at 23:57 | Registered CommenterMark Forster
The dot is an excellent idea Mark. I've been losing the place quite a lot, so what I did was to number the items in the margin when I cross them them out. It's not difficult to find the last item (but it's easier to find a single dot I imagine). The good thing about numbering the items is you can backtrack and see what order you did them in and if you write the date of the first item you do that day in the margin (in brackets say, so you don't confuse it with the date you entered the first item), then you can fairly easily walk through everything you did on that day and in order. I find a disadvantage with the basic system is there is no way to know what you actually did on any particular day.
January 8, 2009 at 12:13 | Unregistered CommenterKevin Geoghegan
It's strange but I started by making sure I could keep track of when I did a particular item but that has lost it's importance. I find that it now does not matter to me when I did an item, just what is still outstanding. Has anyone else found that?

I can see that I will need to keep track of certain tasks, for example if anything is billable or needs to be reported on, but suspect I will generate a system for that when I need to.
January 8, 2009 at 12:34 | Unregistered CommenterChristine B
Christine B,

Yes - I have an electronic-based approach using a PDA virtually all the time. And I've not bothered keeping track of any task start/completion dates since AF was released on Monday.

Neither do I "cross off" any items. I just move the task to the last electronic page once I have done a bit of it so I have pages of gradually decreasing numbers of items.

None of this has made any difference at all to the effectiveness of me getting things done.

As you say, it is only what is left to be done that really matters.
January 8, 2009 at 13:42 | Unregistered CommenterFrank
Kevin:

The other bonus from putting a dot against the item you are starting is that it somehow seems to commit you to the item. Also when you are as old as I am the most common phrase to be saying to oneself is "What am I supposed to be doing?" A quick glance at the page to locate the dot puts me right back on track!
January 8, 2009 at 15:16 | Registered CommenterMark Forster
Kevin and Christine:

Although I suggested in the instructions that one should put the date next to the first item one enters each day, I haven't done it myself for quite a while. I really put it so that people starting the system could see that they really were progressing very fast!

However it does help sometimes to monitor your speed. What I did when I first tried the system was when I crossed an item out was just write the number of the day next to the line, i.e. today I would write an 8. That means you can easily see when the item was entered and when it was completed.
January 8, 2009 at 15:20 | Registered CommenterMark Forster
Thanks for that Mark. I am noting the date against the first item each day which is helpful for keeping track and also for me to see the difference in volume on the days when I have a complete day to work as opposed to only a few hours. The volume of items is not telling me anything at present because a lot of the new items I am now adding are carry overs from DIT declared backlogs so would skew any statistics. Once they are all included (which I am entering gradually rather than in one go) it will provide an interesting means of comparison. I am struggling with the speed aspect at present (mentally really as opposed to physically) because the items added from backlog are a lot more high resistance - and more time intensive. Need to think that point through some more - cue new "thinking time" task!
January 8, 2009 at 16:20 | Unregistered CommenterChristine B
A simple paper clip can also help to identify the current "active"/selected task.
January 8, 2009 at 17:43 | Unregistered CommenterChristian Gärtner