To Think About . . .

It’s not whether you win or lose, it’s how you place the blame. Oscar Wilde

 

 

 

My Latest Book

Product Details

Also available on Amazon.com, Amazon.fr, and other Amazons and bookshops worldwide! 

Search This Site
Log-in
My Other Books

Product Details

Product Details

Product Details

The Pathway to Awesomeness

Click to order other recommended books.

Find Us on Facebook Badge

FV and FVP Forum > What about easy low-resistance benchmarks?

This probably won't happen much once FV is in use for a while, but I was just wondering whether it makes sense to go through the whole preselection process if the benchmark is low-resistance enough. In other words, if the current benchmark seems easy and quick to do, and you're ready to do it, why not stop scanning and just do it, rather than asking the "What would I rather do?" question and scanning down the list again?
March 13, 2012 at 21:57 | Unregistered Commenterubi
I guess the answer to the question "what do I want to do before..." in this case is "nothing", so you just do it and move on to the next item. Seems to fit the system perfectly.
March 13, 2012 at 22:10 | Unregistered CommenterMarc (from Brussels)
I think you are correct, Marc. After re-reading the instructions, I noticed that Mark didn't explicitly write that one had to scan down the whole list – 'nothing' is always a valid answer. Thanks.
March 13, 2012 at 22:36 | Unregistered Commenterubi
I had that happen a couple of times. I still felt it was useful to scan the remainder of the list quickly.
Mark mentioned in the instructions the concept of psychological readiness. Sometimes, reading an item over an over can soften my resistance to it. Eventually I feel, "just do that &#! thing already so you can stop looking at it!"
March 14, 2012 at 0:44 | Unregistered Commentermoises
Mark did mention "If you don't go to the end of the list then you are in danger of missing out the more urgent tasks which tend to be found there."
Ref http://www.markforster.net/fv-forum/post/1755774#post1755860
March 14, 2012 at 4:37 | Unregistered Commentersabre23t
There's probably some value in scanning the rest of the list anyway, because it will focus you on the most absurdly trivial things in the list. With a weightier benchmark, you might be more likely to skip over them.
March 14, 2012 at 4:38 | Unregistered CommenterBernie
Perhaps the more urgent tasks entered at the end of the list need to be flagged differently, so that they stand out on a quick initial scan, or is the initial scan 'not permitted' and one just starts at that first unactioned task always?

The instructions say "the chain starts with the first unactioned task". Anyone doing a quick scan before they start the first, or any, chain?

I would hesitate to use a big asterisk to highlight an urgent task as it is entered at the end of the list, maybe a circle inside which the dot can be placed when it is selected.

However, all of need to remember one of Mark's caveats from AF1 days and since: if it's really urgent when it arrives, and is deemed critical, just do it.
March 14, 2012 at 5:15 | Unregistered CommenterRoger J
ubi:

The question isn't what would I rather do, but what do I want to do before x. The fact that something is low resistance doesn't mean that there isn't another task which you want to do before it for some other reason (importance, urgency, timeliness, fear of consequences, etc.)

Most of the delay in getting FV finalized was caused by getting the exact wording of the question right. It is designed to be a question which takes into account *all* the reasons for giving something priority.
March 14, 2012 at 6:21 | Registered CommenterMark Forster
I happily add additional items to the pre-select list. It means I increase procrastination, but it makes it very clear what's standing out, what's being avoided, what I'd rather be doing etc. I think that increased awareness is valuable in itself. In other words, it shows me what "psychological readiness" means for me.
March 14, 2012 at 9:49 | Unregistered Commentermichael