To Think About . . .

It’s not whether you win or lose, it’s how you place the blame. Oscar Wilde

 

 

 

My Latest Book

Product Details

Also available on Amazon.com, Amazon.fr, and other Amazons and bookshops worldwide! 

Search This Site
Log-in
Latest Comments
My Other Books

Product Details

Product Details

Product Details

The Pathway to Awesomeness

Click to order other recommended books.

Find Us on Facebook Badge

FV and FVP Forum > Top-down chain processing

One drawback I've noticed when doing FV is that I can choose to delay completing the current chain, and thus avoid ever getting to the dreaded root task. Within the rules, one can add an 'urgent' task to the end of the current chain. More often, I just don't get through the last chain as the day wears on. (At the beginning of the next day, I reset my list by moving the remainder of the chain back up to the top of the list – this is not strictly in the rules, but it's easy to do if you work electronically.)

So now I'm contemplating building the chain using the standard question, but then working it top-down. That is, although I *want* to do something else before the root task, I will take at least some action on the root first. I hope that this will get me through more chains per day.

Has anyone else tried something like this?
October 9, 2012 at 23:25 | Registered Commenterubi
I felt something similar when the system first came out - I felt i could also delay completing the chain, meanwhile more urgent tasks or more important tasks would come up. However, I haven't felt that problem for a long time. The solution? I just stuck to the system. Once I had my chain selected, unless a building was on fire, I would just do some work on the next item on the chain, even if it's just a little bit. Soon enough I'd get to the root task and then create a new chain. What I found incredible about this is that it honestly feels like I have someone else working on my tasks with me. I would start working on a task on my list and realize that it's already half done. I felt like asking "who did this?" What a great feeling. That feeling of having this second person working with me has in fact doubled my productivity. But back to the original point, my suggestion is to trust the system as best you can. I doubt any system will completely eliminate the need for at least a bit of willpower and concentration.

Hope this helps.
October 10, 2012 at 21:04 | Unregistered CommenterPaul MacNeil
Thanks, Paul. I agree with your sentiment about just working the system. I tend to build a chain quickly, and sometimes do them in a different order than strict bottom-up (or top-down in the proposed variant) – this is perhaps too easy with an electronic solution such as the Clear app for iPhone. But whatever works for completing the chain before the end of the day!
October 10, 2012 at 21:45 | Registered Commenterubi
I've been there as well. My solution is to keep the chain very short (3 to 5 items) and work it as per the rules. This has several effects :
- the shorter the chain, the fewer the chances that an urgency comes up and move me away from the root task
- I have much more than 5 things to do in a day, so it pushes me to do little and often, which builds momentum as Alan said above.
- feeling of achievement when a chain is finished : encouraging !

Two difficulties though :
1- selecting only up to 5 items is hard when more than that are urgent. I try to start with short actions on the first chain, so that I feel urgent stuff is done quickly.
2- working on the root task when I know I still have urgent stuff to do later (which will be in next chain. Here again the short chain helps : I will get to the root task during the morning, so I know I still have plenty of time for urgent-today stuff, so I can spare 15-30 minutes on this dreaded root task !

hope this helps...
October 11, 2012 at 10:35 | Unregistered CommenterAlexB
I aim to work from the bottom up. However, I have several repeating tasks so they are usually at the bottom so I work on them first, but because I am working on them often it means they are easy to complete. For example I have tidy the kitchen, if I tidy it today in 2 days time it should be a quick job to tidy anything that has been left out. I can then move on to the older tasks.

However, sometimes I feel that items are stuck at the top, or I am bored with the ones at the bottom and then I tend to alternate between top and bottom.

I know this goes against rules, but it follows Mark's comments in one of his books (can't remember which one probably DIT) that it doesn't matter what order you use to complete your list the aim is to complete it. So I feel if I've got myself 'stuck' on a chain it is better to proactively do another task than procrastinate around the bottom.
October 19, 2012 at 12:23 | Unregistered CommenterKate Davis