To Think About . . .

It’s not whether you win or lose, it’s how you place the blame. Oscar Wilde

 

 

 

My Latest Book

Product Details

Also available on Amazon.com, Amazon.fr, and other Amazons and bookshops worldwide! 

Search This Site
Log-in
Latest Comments
My Other Books

Product Details

Product Details

Product Details

The Pathway to Awesomeness

Click to order other recommended books.

Find Us on Facebook Badge

FV and FVP Forum > How I test Mark's systems

Like many people here, I've gone through many trials of systems and many iterations of AF. Some work form me, some don't. Here's how I test a system:
1. I Read and understand the directions and principles underlying it as best and most thoroughly as I can, asking questions about it on this forum if I need to;
2. I start the system, in whatever way the instructions suggest to start it. (For example, instructions might suggest using a fresh list, using a shorter list (like FVP), using whatever I was already using);
3. I Use it as my main task management system "for a time." How much time? Long enough for me to understand the system and before my life turns to chaos if the system doesn't work. (see 4);
3. I Check back with the instructions, making sure I'm doing it correctly, especially if I get into trouble. What kind of trouble? Usually a missed task or a feeling of panic because something is missing.
4. I pay very close attention to my feelings. I find that when a system is not working, after a few days with it, or sometimes as long as a week or so, my life starts feeling out of control. This, to me, is the main reason for abandoning a system - I'm looking for David Allen's "mind like water." I realize that no system can create that sense of peace, but a poorly functioning system can take it away.
5. If the system is not working, I go back to whatever was working previously, which becomes a kind of benchmark system for me. Then, and only then will I start thinking about ways of tweaking the new system, all the while keeping up with my stuff because I'm using a system that works. For example, if this system eventually fails me (as FV had done in the past) I'll just go back to the random method.
I will only add what we all know, that this is all very personal and relative. All I can say at this point is that if FV or FVP doesn't work for me, it doesn't mean its a bad system, just that it doesn't fit well with my temperament. On the contrary, all of Mark's systems have been fantastic, the benchmarks I have used have been really outstanding and set a very high standard. As a working system, nothing comes close the the effectiveness of AF. I'd be interested in a deeper understanding of why it works so well.
May 23, 2015 at 16:20 | Unregistered CommenterPaul MacNeil