To Think About . . .

It’s not whether you win or lose, it’s how you place the blame. Oscar Wilde

 

 

 

My Latest Book

Product Details

Also available on Amazon.com, Amazon.fr, and other Amazons and bookshops worldwide! 

Search This Site
Log-in
Latest Comments
My Other Books

Product Details

Product Details

Product Details

The Pathway to Awesomeness

Click to order other recommended books.

Find Us on Facebook Badge

Discussion Forum > Experimenting again

<<'ll accept your definition of pipe dreams ...>>

It all depends what's in the pipe.
August 28, 2011 at 17:49 | Registered CommenterBernie
August 28, 2011 at 18:46 | Registered CommenterAlan Baljeu
That video is amazing, especially the first bit when each ball does three things. If you want the first note, you get two others, and they have to work.
August 28, 2011 at 20:38 | Registered CommenterCricket
Cricket:

It is amazing - but it's an amazing piece of animation, not the real thing. I wonder if anyone has succeeded in doing something similar for real.
August 28, 2011 at 22:11 | Registered CommenterMark Forster
Animation or not, from what I saw of the first bit, if a ball is thrown it makes all three sounds.

Somewhere there's a Japanese commercial of Pachelbel's Canon in D Major done by a ball falling down a series of wooden blocks, but I can't find it.
August 28, 2011 at 22:43 | Registered CommenterCricket
Cricket:

<< but I can't find it. >>

This would be an example of spending hours on-line whenever you switch on the computer rather than doing the next task or spending time with your family, would it? :-)
August 29, 2011 at 0:17 | Registered CommenterMark Forster
+JMJ+

Mark: <<There's no dismissal in this system, automatic or otherwise.>>

So I guess you are back with DWM's "over the waterfall" deletion (not dismissal) of items after a specified time, am I correct?
August 29, 2011 at 3:56 | Registered Commenternuntym
nuntym:

<< So I guess you are back with DWM's "over the waterfall" deletion (not dismissal) of items after a specified time, am I correct? >>

No.
August 29, 2011 at 7:45 | Registered CommenterMark Forster
+JMJ+

Mark: <<No.>>

Huh, Now THIS I gotta see ^___^

Godspeed!
August 29, 2011 at 11:11 | Registered Commenternuntym
Mark: Exactly! (I'm staying out of the kitchen but readily available now while two pre-teen girls cook. A bit of internet distraction is good.)
August 29, 2011 at 17:05 | Registered CommenterCricket
Cricket:

<<Somewhere there's a Japanese commercial of Pachelbel's Canon in D Major done by a ball falling down a series of wooden blocks, but I can't find it.>>

Would this be it? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_CDLBTJD4M

… well, I *was* procrastinating anyway :)
August 29, 2011 at 19:32 | Registered CommenterHugo Ferreira
Hugo,

That's a great video. The song is "Jesu Joy of Man's Desiring" by Bach, not Pachelbel's Canon, so I'm not sure if it's the one Cricket remembers. It's interesting that the tempo varies quite a bit, even though they obviously took a lot of care to keep the slope constant, and built longer pieces of wood for longer notes. So if anyone tries to replicate one of Animusic's concepts in actual hardware, with pipes and balls rolling and bouncing, they would need to take this type of variability into account.
August 29, 2011 at 19:54 | Registered Commenterubi
Yes, that's the one. That explains why I couldn't find it.
August 29, 2011 at 20:01 | Registered CommenterCricket
Haven't been there for a while but what a surprise, a new system!
In fact I have tried most of Mark's systems, some lasted weeks and others months, but never a whole year. I guess they were too compulsive or not efficent enough (this balance is hard to get).
I am eager to try this new 2 to 7 thing, the sooner the better (^o^)/
August 31, 2011 at 6:38 | Registered Commenterisd

InfoThis thread has been locked.