Discussion Forum > The Future of the Newsletter
B Please
January 7, 2008 |
HW
HW
For me, it would be (c).
But, whatever!
But, whatever!
January 7, 2008 |
EAM
EAM
b please.
The main benefit for having the e-newsletter is convenience.
The main benefit for having the e-newsletter is convenience.
January 7, 2008 |
Mike Garth
Mike Garth
I'd prefer c
January 7, 2008 |
Susan Kersley
Susan Kersley
C please
January 7, 2008 |
Miles
Miles
I prefer B
Thanks & Happy New Year!
Thanks & Happy New Year!
January 7, 2008 |
Kay
Kay
(B) gets my vote
January 7, 2008 |
Jason V
Jason V
I'm open to all, but if (c) I would come to blog more often,
It's possible though that others "wouldnt" follow-up links in an email..
Want to keep getting it anyways!
It's possible though that others "wouldnt" follow-up links in an email..
Want to keep getting it anyways!
January 7, 2008 |
Tom
Tom
I would prefer option B, as it would mean the articles find me, rather than vice versa. Thanks.
January 7, 2008 |
Helen Swallow
Helen Swallow
how about b and c?
links first for those who want to come to blog
links first for those who want to come to blog
January 7, 2008 |
Tom
Tom
c gets my vote , incidentally may I take this opportunity of thanking you for all the pearls of wisdom during 07.
January 7, 2008 |
Michael Harrison
Michael Harrison
b. or c. - Happy New Year!
January 7, 2008 |
John
John
I'd be happy with b.
January 7, 2008 |
A swedish mom
A swedish mom
B and/or C
And thanks again for sharing your work. :)
And thanks again for sharing your work. :)
January 7, 2008 |
KCCC
KCCC
b or c, whichever is easiest.
January 7, 2008 |
Tony Phillips
Tony Phillips
I would prefer c. I love our articles but don't look at the blog unless i get an email. Headings would be perfect.
Thanks
Thanks
January 7, 2008 |
Jenny
Jenny
I think B would work best.
You could also add some links at the end for additional topics or articles not included in the newsletter that might encourage people to go to the blog as well.
You could also add some links at the end for additional topics or articles not included in the newsletter that might encourage people to go to the blog as well.
January 7, 2008 |
Julie
Julie
C please
January 7, 2008 |
dellison
dellison
Having a newsletter still seems to be the best way to get people to actually read the information.
Certainly to more 'clicks' that we have to do to get to the useful stuff, the less likely we are to read it.
Blogs are often generally less cleanly laid out too. Id' certainly appreciate the newsletter continuing.
Certainly to more 'clicks' that we have to do to get to the useful stuff, the less likely we are to read it.
Blogs are often generally less cleanly laid out too. Id' certainly appreciate the newsletter continuing.
January 7, 2008 |
RIchard Nugent
RIchard Nugent
Obviously one of the main functions of the newsletter (from my point of view) is to advertise my own products, e.g. seminars, books and I've no intention of ceasing that.
The main question for me is whether new articles should continue to be posted in two different places, i.e. on the blog or on the newsletter.
The alternatives I can see at present are:
a. The newsletter has articles specially written for it which do not appear on the blog. In that way it would be something separate and distinct from the blog.
or
b. The newsletter repeats major articles which also appears on the blog. In that case it would be acting as a convenience for people who don't for whatever reason want to read the blog, but do want some input.
or
c. The newsletter merely draws readers' attention to what has been appearing on the blog. In this case it would be acting as an extension of the blog and as a way of reminding people to have a look at it.
What do you think?