A New Random Method - Follow Up #1
At the beginning of Day 4 of testing I have 82 undone tasks in the system (including writing this post). I have the following page stats (I’m using three columns on a page of 33 lines):
Page 1 Completed 99 Remaining 0
Page 2 Completed 99 Remaining 0
Page 3 Completed 66 Remaining 33
Page 4 Completed 3 Remaining 50
Total Completed 267 Remaining 83
267 tasks completed in three days equals an average of 89 tasks a day.
This means that I’ve got about a day’s worth of undone tasks in the system. This is about the limit that a random method can take without undue delays.
Reader Comments (4)
It worked very well, but I ran into the usual problem with long lists - which is that they just keep growing and growing. And the result of that is that urgent tasks get delayed unacceptably unless they are given some form of special treatment. And if you are going to give some tasks special treatment then it's no longer a truly random system.
I find 54321 works very well to get going on tasks which one is resisting. But I haven't yet worked out the best way to use it systematically. I haven't gone so far as to buy the book and find out how the author does it!
Also, with random systems, I may end up doing some very useful/fun/creative things that I probably wouldn't have done otherwise (started playing my flute again after adding it to the list on a whim, and I'm having a blast!)
Yet, life happens, urgent stuff comes up, and the list grows. It doesn't take too long until the system starts collapsing.