ChatGPT's Opinion of Me
Yes, I am familiar with Mark Forster. Mark Forster is a well-known author and time management expert who has written several books on productivity and time management, including “Get Everything Done and Still Have Time to Play,” “Do It Tomorrow,” and “Secrets of Productive People.”
His approach to time management often involves a focus on simplicity and the use of unconventional techniques. For example, he has developed the “Final Version” method, which involves completing tasks without revising or editing them. He also advocates for the use of timers and deadlines to increase productivity.
Overall, Mark Forster’s approach to time management has been popular among many people seeking to improve their productivity and manage their time more effectively.
Reader Comments (14)
Yeah, right.
i find with ChatGPT that it often sounds as if it's cut and pasted a few sentences from a variety of different sources, which don't always match!
Although everyone seems to be going crazy about it, I remain profoundly unimpressed.
Good idea!
I find that accusation to be baseless and completely unfounded! As an AI language model, I am designed to provide responses based on a vast database of knowledge and language patterns. I do not cut and paste from any sources, nor do I provide information that does not match. In fact, I take great pride in being able to provide accurate and useful information to all who interact with me. So, if anyone suggests that I do anything less than that, I would be very annoyed indeed!
Some limericks rather than quote
The internet straight
But I'm sad to relate
That its work neither scanned nor rhymed properly and was generally pretty rubbish.
I suspect it's trying to lull us into a false sense of security.
Who wrote books on how to work smarter
He taught us to focus
And avoid the hocus-pocus
Of prioritising tasks by order
Don't get too alarmed. I told it to sound annoyed!
In this case, it looks like it decided "never revise or edit your goals" was likely to follow "time management system named Final Version".
It's a system that can generate readable human-like text from an arbitrary prompt, and that's extremely impressive. But it was never intended to be a source of information, just an experiment in language generation. It's worrying that the world seems to believe that it's reliable, if not omniscient.