Email Inbox as To-Do List - Update

It didn’t take me long to decide that this isn’t for me - at least not in the way I was trying to do it. I will have a think about a better way to organize it, and maybe have another go in a few days.
Also available on Amazon.com, Amazon.fr, and other Amazons and bookshops worldwide!
It didn’t take me long to decide that this isn’t for me - at least not in the way I was trying to do it. I will have a think about a better way to organize it, and maybe have another go in a few days.
Inspired by my post today about Nudgemail and always up for an experiment in time management, I’ve decided to have a go tomorrow at using my email inbox as my to-do list. So I’ve written out a list of everything I can think of, 35 items in total, and emailed each one to Nudgemail to send back to me tomorrow first thing. I did a few for this evening as well. I’ve also put reminders in for all the things in my calendar for the next month which require some form of preparation.
I’m not quite sure what to expect but I’ll publish occasional updates during the day. (Note to self: get Nudgemail to remind me about the updates)
Must go. Nudgemail is telling me to read Proust, tidy the bedroom and check my finances!
Over the last week or so I’ve been using Nudgemail to great effect. I think there are others like it, though I haven’t tried any of them yet. It works particularly well at providing the reminders for a “no-list” system, though you could use it with any system.
Here are a few of the things you can do with it:
The one thing it doesn’t do at the moment is forward attachments to emails, though this is promised for the future.
Definitely worth trying out, especially as it’s entirely free. If you are impressed by it you can show your gratitude by signing on as a sponsor for a monthly amount set by you.
One of the things I harp on endlessly about is that good routines are at the heart of good time management. This applies whatever time management system you use (or none).
Having good routines doesn’t mean that you can’t be spontaneous or creative. In fact having good routines means you are freed up so you can be spontaneous and creative.
The key word when it comes to building routines is persistence. This is to be taken two ways:
So it’s a case of persistence building on persistence.
Among other things, it’s particulary important that routines should establish:
How do you build routines? Actually the answer is that you are already an expert routine builder. You have been building them every day of your life. Every habit you have is the result. This applies to bad habits as well as good habits unfortunately.
You build up the good habits I mentioned above in exactly the same way that you may already have build up their opposite bad habits:
If you suffer from any of these, remember that these are habits - not character flaws which are impossible to overcome. They may be difficult to break because after all you’ve spent a long time building them up!
An output (no-list) approach will help to give you a short cut to this. Using this approach, your mind will naturally fall into the same channels each day. All you have to do is check that the channels are right. Fortunately it’s quite easy to check what you have done and to correct it if it’s wrong. For example if you are having trouble exercising put exercising at or near the beginning of the day.
Habits of going to bed and getting up are also very important. The best way of establishing good practice here is to get up at the same time every day, preferably as early as possible, regardless of whether it’s a work day or a day off. If you do this your going to bed time will naturally adjust.
I find that the best output approach for this sort of good routine and habit building is the rotating list.
It’s been a long time since I last reported on my book challenge - and that’s because it’s been a disaster. I haven’t made any progress on any book since.
I’ve just changed tack again, starting yesterday. My new method is this:
To borrow a metaphor from the world of running, I am now seeing how far I can run in half an hour rather than seeing how long it takes to cover a certain distance. I’ve adopted that for my running practice as well - with one session of an hour. (4.63 miles today since you ask!)
In my February 12th article What is a “no-list” system? I gave an example of what a typical “catch-all” list looks like:
Tidy bedroom
Change bedding
List PR actions
Read “C——-” magazine
Read “K———” magazine
Obtain specimen legacy leaflet
Draft own legacy leaflet
Thank fundraising team
Blog result of fundraising
Thank newsletter subscribers
Cancel newsletter contract
Thank supporters
Blog latest social event news
Call David K
Read —— Newletter
Update giving page
Read “The 100 Years War”
List possible blog posts
Yabla
Read “B———” magazine
Clean sink
Empty WPB
Cut hedge back
Set up L’s new laptop
Read V’s letters
Print more blank schedule sheets
Shred
Dust
Listen to French news
Sort office
Process social event photos
Walk footpaths for Ramblers Association
Money?
Weed desktop
Weed flagged emails
Contact fast walking organization
To think about…
Prune rose bush
Get prescription signed
Sort L’s mail
List action need on C Blog
New house number
Kingsley Vale walk
Destroy old notebook
Re-read L’s instructions
Expenditure audit
Tax return
Weed pamphlet rack
Withdraw money from ——
Book holiday
Check heating settings
Action needed on Legacy campaign?
Write recommendation for N’s book
Push ups
The plank
Check bank balance
Weed this list
Read Pocket articles
Facebook
Email
Synchronise diaries
Put books away
Paper
Thanks to N for party
Check diary
Rake leaves
Voicemail
Do dishes
Adjust carriage clock
Charge batteries
Check heating settings
Ideas for new projects?
etc etc
I also gave an example of what a typical “no-list” looks like. Many “no-lists” are actually or shorter than this:
Blog
List ideas for new book
Email
Publicity Project
Walk 3 miles
And I asked the question “Which do you think is likely to produce the most focused action?”
I was re-reading this article yesterday evening, and it struck me that the real difference between the lists was not their length, but the fact that the “catch-all” list concentrates on input while the “no-list” concentrates on output.
The “catch-all” is basically a list of everything that might, should or could be done sometime in the near future. It gathers together all the ideas, requests, thoughts, obligations, necessities, commitments that continue to enter one’s life in an almost incessant stream. It is in other words a list of all the input into one’s life. When, how and whether it will all actually get done is another question.
The “no-list” on the other hand is a list of the things you are actually about to do in the immediate future, usually in the order in which you are going to do them. Barring unforeseen events, they will get done more or less immediately. The “no-list” in other words is not concerned with listing input, it is purely a list of what is about to be output.
As such it will fill the entire day with output. The list of tasks on your “no-list” which have been crossed out as completed may be almost as long as a “catch-all” list. The difference is the rather major one that the “catch-all” list at the end of the day is a list of what hasn’t been done, while the “no-list” is a list of what has been done.
Of course the real question is not the mechanics of how things get done, but whether the things which get done are what should have been done. The common objection to a “no-list” approach is that one may forget to do things because one is simply relying on one’s memory. This is not really a valid objection for two reasons:
Let’s look more closely at the second point. When your mind has no long list to rely on, what sort of tasks is it going to choose next to put on the “no-list”? It will probably come up with some of the following;
This results in much more focused action than a long diffuse list of “everything”.
The final type of no-list system I want to describe is the Rotating List. There are many possible variations, but the essence of a rotating list is that tasks are re-entered if they are going to be needed again at any time during the current day.
This characteristic means that they are normally started again at the beginning of the day. They grow too unwieldy if kept going for a period longer than a day.
They are usually combined with an Entry by Doing approach. The sequence of work is:
A variation of this is to enter more than one new task at a time in step 1. Either way the list gradually lengthens as the day progresses.
An example of a rotating list system is Spinning Plates, though this is more complicated than the basic rotating list method described above.
If you find this article useful, why not buy me a coffee?
I’ve just spent an hour or so tagging all the posts about “No List”.
Please let me know in the comments if you find any that I’ve missed.
Making Time for Idleness and Reverie
“Perhaps working all the time doesn’t make us productive.”
“Here’s a little game you can play to encourage yourself to do the stuff that really matters.”
It’s Like Walking Across a Muddy Field
How to get rid of backlogs
I’ll Just Get the File Out
Conquer Procrastination for Ever
Expand Your Ideas the Easy Way!
From first idea to fully developed concept
I’m 90% Sure That …
Find out what you really mean when you say you’re 90% sure
Wholehearted Living
When to say Yes, and when to say No
To Do Lists — How we hate them!
Tips on how to make your to-do list loveable
How to Get Any Project Up and Running
Putting First Things First
One Thing at a Time
Exercise complete control over your projects
An Easy Challenge
Plan your day’s work realistically
Guilty Goals
Do you really want your goals to come true?
Feeling Good
Live better by monitoring your mental state
Keep Your Life Moving
The top 10 tips for keeping out of the rut
“Forget hard and fast rules and commandments of time management - how about some flexible principles which allow for the reality of interruptions, harness the fact that most of us work better with a cut-off point approaching, and let you modify your approach depending on your job situation, your current workload or even your daily mood? “
Kevin Burch, The Confidence Coach
The third type of no-list method I want to describe is to get on with your tasks without doing any writing at all. This is of course the method used by the vast majority of people in the world.
Doing it effectively is quite another matter though.
I described this method in detail in my book How to Make Your Dreams Come True (Hodder 2002). In it I showed how to arrive at clarity about your goals and keep progressing towards them. Most of what I say in Secrets of Productive People (Hodder 2015) is also relevant to this method.
I’m not going to repeat here what I said in either book. But here are a few practices which will make this method more productive for you:
Entry by Doing is a bit different from the Hammer as described in my post yesterday.
In the Hammer a short list of tasks is written (usually five or less) and then the tasks are done.
However in an Entry by Doing method a task can only be entered on the list by actually doing it there and then.
The simplest form of this is where you write the next task you are going to do and then doing it. You then write the next task you are going to do and do that. The effect of writing it down before you do it is to make you think about what you are going to do next rather than drift into it. It’s an aid to focus.
Once a task is on the list it can be re-entered if there is still work to be done. This can be used with a system like Autofocius or FVP to make an active list in which all the tasks are actually in the course of being done.
There are many different types of no-list methods. I won’t go quite so far as to say that they have an infinite variety, but there are all sorts of ways of approaching their design. Since there is no permanent list involved, switching from one method to another can be done without much of a problem.
Over the next few days I’m going to describe some of the main types of no-list method. I don’t claim that the list is exhausive, but I hope that it may spart some ideas in your own mind to experiment with.
First type of No-List method I’m going to describe is what I call a “Hammer”.
The main characteristic of a Hammer is that it concentrates on getting a task finished by constantly alternating with one or more other tasks until there is no more work to be done on the task - hammering it home in fact, hence the name.
The method I recommend in Secrets of Productive People is a Hammer. Five tasks are entered. Each is re-entered until it is finished and when the list is down to two tasks three more are entered.
I call this a 5/2 Hammer. The first figure refers to the number of tasks which are initially entered on the list and the second figure refers to the number of tasks at which the list is topped up to its original number.
Other Hammers include:
You can experiment with various different lengths until you find the one that suits you best.
Tomorrow I’m going to describe a completely different type of No-List method.
Here’s a little game you can play to encourage yourself to do the stuff that really matters.
Write a list of the things you hope to have done by the end of the day. Make sure to identify how you will know when you have done each task.
Then allocate points to each task according to a table of values. You can make up your own table, but here’s one for starters:
The Current Initiative: minus 25 points if you don’t work on it.
Major Projects: plus 20 points each
Lesser Projects: plus 10 points each
Routine Tasks: plus 5 points each
Tasks not on the list: 0 points.
How you define the difference between Major, Lesser and Routine projects/tasks is up to you, but it’s important to be consistent. The Current Initiative is one project selected in advance - note that you score minus points for not doing it, rather than plus points for doing it. This is because the idea behind the Current Initiative is that you do some work on it every day until it is completed (according to your definition of “completed”).
At the end of the day add up the points for the tasks you have done (according to your definition of “done”) and record the total for the day.
Each day try to beat your best total so far.
As I’ve been away most of the day today, there will be no main article tomorrow.
I’ve compiled this list from my experiences of coaching many clients who owned small businesses or ran their own one-person business. And to that I must add my own experiences with my own business. Many of these points are transferable to people in other situations.
Of course this list is not comprehensive. There are many other mistakes to be made, but these are the ones I came across most often.
I have often noticed how much the things I pay attention to before going to bed at night affect what I do when I get up in the morning. In fact it could almost be said that what sort of day I am going to have today was decided yesterday evening - and I don’t just mean when one wakes up with a hang-over!
Here are some of the things you can do in the late evening to increase your chances of having a productive day tomorrow.
So exactly how do you do anything?
You do it by applying sufficient regular focused attention. Let’s look at the parts of that.
Sufficient
You have to put the hours in. It takes time, and that means making time for it. It also means that time which should be allocated for it isn’t used for doing other stuff instead. It’s good practice at the beginning of each day to write a list of the most important things that you want to have done that day. Then check at the end of the day that you actually have done those things and take remedial action if you haven’t.
Regular
Decide what frequency is appropriate for the project and keep to it. Usually, but by no means always, daily is best. And usually, but not always, it’s best to do it early in the day.
Focused
Just generally messing around in an unfocused way achieves little. if you’re learning a skill you should be focusing on what needs practice . If you’re building something, focus on what needs doing next. As a general rule, get the skills right before you start applying them.
Attention
“Time management” isn’t really about managing time. It’s about managing your attention. Anything that you give your attention to will change and develop. But remember your attention is finite - allocate it carefully.